Lying and deception theory and practice pdf
File Name: lying and deception theory and practice .zip
- Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice
- The Definition of Lying and Deception
- Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice, by Thomas L. Carson.
- Lying and Deception. Theory and Practice - By Thomas L. Carson
Deception or falsehood is an act or statement which misleads, hides the truth , or promotes a belief, concept, or idea that is not true. It is often done for personal gain or advantage. There is also self-deception , as in bad faith.
Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice
Honesty may be the best policy, but scheming and dishonesty are part of what makes us human. In the fall of Princeton University welcomed into its freshman class a young man named Alexi Santana, whose life story the admissions committee had found extraordinarily compelling. He had barely received any formal schooling. Running in the Mojave Desert, he had trained himself to be a distance runner. Santana quickly became something of a star on campus.
This book addresses questions in ethical theory and practical questions about lying, deception, and information disclosure in public affairs, business and professional ethics, and personal relationships. Part I is a conceptual map for the rest of the book. The book examines the implications of Kant's theory, act-utilitarianism, Ross's theory, and rule-consequentialism for moral ques The book examines the implications of Kant's theory, act-utilitarianism, Ross's theory, and rule-consequentialism for moral questions about lying and deception. The book argues that Kant's absolutism about lying is untenable and that his moral theory doesn't commit him to being an absolutist.
The Definition of Lying and Deception
Not a MyNAP member yet? Register for a free account to start saving and receiving special member only perks. The lying is done by individuals who are not experienced at deception. Because the lying is done at the request of the experimenter, it may differ qualitatively from unsanctioned lying in social contexts. Laboratory lying does not, in itself, benefit the liar, nor does it do obvious harm to the target of the lie.
Basic and applied research on deception and its detection View all 16 Articles. Deception is a complex social behavior which involves a set of higher cognitive functions. Studying this common phenomenon in humans has in all epochs been driven not merely by the wish to understand the underlying framework of cognitive functioning but rather by the ambition to detect deceptive behavior in criminal suspects. Thus, identifying valid indicators of deceptive behavior has always been in the focus of deception research. Such indicators can be defined in terms of specific behavior, physiological correlates, or content of verbal reports. The question of how validly each indicator allows for differentiating truthful and deceptive accounts is inherent in the majority of research efforts in this domain.
Request PDF | Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice | This book addresses questions in ethical theory and practical questions about lying.
Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice, by Thomas L. Carson.
While this may overstate the case to some degree, lying and deception are certainly critical issues in moral philosophy and in everyday life. Thomas Carson has given us the first book-length philosophical work in decades to systematically confront these issues. The book is divided into three sections. Roughly speaking, you lie if you say something that you do not believe and you warrant the truth of what you say.
Please note: In order to keep Hive up to date and provide users with the best features, we are no longer able to fully support Internet Explorer. The site is still available to you, however some sections of the site may appear broken. We would encourage you to move to a more modern browser like Firefox, Edge or Chrome in order to experience the site fully.
Lying and Deception. Theory and Practice - By Thomas L. Carson
Questions central to the philosophical discussion of lying to others and other-deception interpersonal deceiving may be divided into two kinds. Questions of the first kind are definitional or conceptual. They include the questions of how lying is to be defined, how deceiving is to be defined, and whether lying is always a form of deceiving. Questions of the second kind are normative — more particularly, moral. They include the questions of whether lying and deceiving are either defeasibly or non-defeasibly morally wrong, whether lying is morally worse than deceiving, and whether, if lying and deception are defeasibly morally wrong, they are merely morally optional on certain occasions, or are sometimes morally obligatory.
Склонность к ребячеству, фанат сквоша с подавляемой сексуальностью. Беккер пожал плечами: - Не исключено, что ты попала в точку. Так продолжалось несколько недель.